226E Single Center Experience with Prospective BK Monitoring in Renal Transplantation

Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Westin Diplomat Resort
Jennifer Trofe-Clark, Pharm, D, BCPS1, Simin Goral, MD2, Deirdre Sawinski, MD2, Melissa Bleicher, MD2, Matthew H. Levine, MD3, Peter L Abt, MD3, Lauren Ende-Schwartz, MD4, Vivanna Vandeerlin, MD, PhD4 and Roy D. Bloom, MD2
1Hospital of the Univ of Pennsylvania Pharmacy Services and Renal Division, Perelman School of Medicine, Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
2Renal Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
3Division of Transplant Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
4Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Pathology and Laboratoyr Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

Purpose: Prospective screening for BK viremia (BKV) post renal transplant (RTR) may prevent BKV nephropathy (BKVN). We sought to: 1) Determine incidence and time to BKV with use of protocolized screening; (2) Examine effect of screening on biopsy proven rejection and BKVN.

Methods: In January 2008, we implemented quantitative BKV plasma screening for all RTR (including kidney-pancreas) patients at 3,6,12 mos then yearly. Detectable BKV was ≥ 2.6 log copies/mL. Patients received induction with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (majority of patients), or basiliximab,  and maintenance w/ tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or enteric coated mycophenolate sodium (ECMS), and steroids. MMF/ECMS was discontinued upon BKV detection, followed by tacrolimus dose decrease if BKV persisted. Biopsies were performed for graft dysfunction. BKVN was defined as light microscopy changes consistent w/ BKVN, and positive VP-1 capsid and SV40 immunostaining. Retrospective analysis was performed for patients transplanted Jan 1, 2008-Sept 31, 2010 who had ≥ 1 BKV results until Dec 31, 2010 and were HIV negative.

Results: Ninety-three percent of 452 patients were screened with: 75%, 66%, 54%, 16% patients having data at 3 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. Nine percent had ≥1 BKV values ≥ 4.0 log/copies/mL, (first detected most often at 3 mos), which has been shown to be associated w/ BKVN. 111 pts transplanted 2005-2007 had biopsies performed during 3 yr pre-screening period vs 111 pts transplanted during screening period. Despite immunosuppression reduction, there was no significant increase in rejection/total RTR patients in pre vs post screening (8% vs 11%, p =0.06). BKV screening decreased BKVN/total RTR patients to 1% from 2% pre-period (p = 0.37). All 5 BKVN patients had BKV ≥4.0 log/copies/mL.

Conclusion: There is currently no effective treatment for BKVN. BKV screening and reduction of immunosuppression did not increase rejection rates and prevented BKVN on clinically indicated biopsies.