230E Evaluation of Medication Education and Adherence of Patients Being Evaluated for Kidney and/or Pancreas Transplantation

Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Westin Diplomat Resort
Tiffany R. Shin, PharmD1, April Delahunty, PharmD, BCPS2, Holli A. Winters, Pharm.D., BCPS2, Donna M. Smolen, BSN, CNN2, Aneeka R. Qureshi, PharmD, Candidate1 and Maria Pruchnicki, Pharm, D, BCPS, CLS1
1The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, Columbus, OH
2The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH

Purpose: 1) Assess prior experience with medication education, medication therapy management (MTM), and medication resources of pre-kidney and/or pancreas transplant patients; 2) identify barriers to adherence; and 3) evaluate patient perceptions regarding receiving pharmacist-provided MTM. 

Methods: Candidates for kidney and/or pancreas transplant were asked to participate in a verbal survey during initial pre-transplant evaluation (March-April 2012).  The survey included open-ended, multiple choice, and likert-type questions addressing participants’ experience with medication education, medication taking habits, and perceived barriers to medication adherence. Baseline demographics were collected, including criteria required for MTM eligibility.  Participants completed a medication adherence assessment [Modified Morisky Scale (MMS)]. 

Results: Twenty-five patients were surveyed, with a mean age of 48 (±10) years.   Fourteen (56%) were male, 17 (68%) Caucasian, and 10 (40%) with Medicare Part D.  Patients took a median of 10 (range 4-24) medications and had 6 (range 2-12) chronic diseases, including 24 (96%) with end-stage renal disease, 24 (96%) with hypertension, and 13 (52%) with diabetes. MMS adherence scores were high in both knowledge and motivation.  On a 4-item scale [a lot, some, a little, or none], 14 (56%) reported they knew “some” information about new prescription medication(s) when leaving the doctor’s office and 16 (64%) reported knowing more about the medication(s) after leaving the pharmacy. No patient reported having had a pharmacist-provided MTM session, though 2 (8%) reported a previous nurse or doctor visit to specifically review medications.  Nineteen (76%) thought it would be helpful to have a pharmacist appointment, and 56% indicated they would probably schedule one if given the opportunity.  Sixty percent of patients reported remembering to take medications as their biggest adherence challenge.

Conclusion: Many pre-kidney and/or pancreas transplant patients are interested in pharmacist-provided MTM, though none have received it.  Patients may benefit from MTM due to the complexity of regimens and the importance of adherence.