284 Pharmacist-led diabetes collaborative drug therapy management program improves glycemic control in patients with uncontrolled T2DM treated with insulin

Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Westin Diplomat Resort
Carrie McAdam-Marx, PhD, RPh1, Brandon T. Jennings, PharmD2, Arati Dahal, PhD3 and Karen Gunning, Pharm.D.4
1University of Utah College Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, Salt Lake City, UT
2University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT
3University of Utah Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, Salt Lake City, UT
4Departments of Pharmacotherapy & Family and Preventive Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT

Purpose: Describe a pharmacist-led, collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) program. Identify clinical and economic outcomes in CDTM patients treated with insulin.

Methods: Two University of Utah Community Clinics implemented a CDTM program in 2008 and 2009. Under a collaborative practice agreement, community clinic pharmacists manage drug therapy and provide medication and disease counseling to patients referred to CDTM by clinic physicians; most are referred for insulin management. To identify CDTM-related outcomes, we compared HbA1c, healthcare utilization, and cost changes after CDTM enrollment in patients with uncontrolled T2DM (HbA1c ≥7.0%) treated with insulin in 2009-2010 to patients with uncontrolled T2DM treated with insulin under usual care at non-CDTM clinics. Change in HbA1c was identified at 6-months (-90 to +180 days) as were changes in utilization and costs 6-month pre-index to 6-months post-index date. Multivariate regression analyses were used to estimate adjusted changes in HbA1c and overall costs controlling for baseline HbA1c and other confounders. 

Results: A total of 95 DCCM patients (mean age 60.4 years; 59% female) and 46 comparison patients (mean age 61.2 years [p>.05]; 48% female [p>.05]) were included. Identification of comparison patients was challenging due to lower insulin use and lack of HbA1c data to assess outcomes. Baseline HbA1c was higher for CDTM (10.3%) than comparison patients (9.1%; p<.001). CDTM patients had a 1.97% greater reduction in HbA1c, which remained significant after adjusting for confounders (coefficient: -1.31; 95% CI -1.76, -0.86). Comparison patients had a greater increase in sub-specialty clinic visits during the follow-up period than CDTM patients (0.5 vs. -0.05 visit change; p=0.01); the adjusted difference in overall costs from pre- to post index date did not differ between groups.

Conclusion: This pharmacist-led CDTM program improved glycemic control without increasing overall costs in patients with uncontrolled T2DM treated with insulin in the community setting.