120E Favorable adverse event profile of tedizolid phosphate compared to linezolid in a phase 3 ABSSSI study

Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Westin Diplomat Resort
Edward Fang, MD1, Carisa De Anda, PharmD1, Anita F. Das, PhD2 and Philippe Prokocimer, MD1
1Trius Therapeutics, San Diego, CA
2AxiStat, Inc., San Francisco, CA

Purpose: Tedizolid phosphate is being developed for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Adverse events reported in a phase 3 ABSSSI study comparing 6 days of oral tedizolid phosphate 200 mg qd (followed by 4 days of placebo) with 10 days of oral linezolid 600 mg bid were reviewed.

Methods: A total of 666 adult subjects with ABSSSI were randomized to tedizolid phosphate or linezolid therapy and received at least one dose of study drug. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) by System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Terms (PT), Investigator-determined relationships and serious adverse events (SAEs) were reviewed. Coding was performed with MedDRA version 13.1.

Results: Overall, TEAEs frequencies were similar in the tedizolid phosphate and linezolid treatment arms, 40.8% and 43.3%, respectively, though rates of Investigator-determined drug-related TEAEs were lower for tedizolid phosphate compared with linezolid, 24.2% and 31.0%, respectively. Rates of TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were 0.6% in both groups, and rates of SAEs were 1.5% and 1.2%, respectively. Most TEAEs in both treatment groups were mild, with similar distribution of severity. 

Conclusion: Overall, subjects receiving tedizolid phosphate and linezolid in this phase 3 ABSSSI trial had similar rates of TEAEs, SAEs, and discontinuation of study drug due to TEAEs. However, there were more Investigator-determined drug-related TEAEs in the linezolid group. Additionally, subjects receiving tedizolid phosphate had significantly better GI tolerability compared with linezolid.