63 Patient care impact and potential cost avoidance generated by student pharmacists during Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences

Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Westin Diplomat Resort
Adam B. Woolley, Pharm.D., BCPS1, Roger A. Edwards, ScD2, Charles A. Berds IV, BS, Pharm2 and Margarita V. DiVall, Pharm.D., BCPS2
1School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA
2Northeastern University School of Pharmacy, Boston, MA

Purpose: Student pharmacist contributions to patient care have been documented in the literature.  However, exploration of potential cost avoidance is warranted. This investigation analyzed interventions documented by fourth-year professional (P4) Northeastern University student pharmacists during Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPEs) in outpatient and inpatient settings. We evaluated student impact on patient care and potential cost avoidance.

Methods: P4 pharmacy students were trained to use a school-wide web-based intervention system (PxDx, E-Value) and encouraged to document interventions throughout 36 weeks of APPEs. The database was retrospectively analyzed to review characteristics of interventions documented during the 2011-12 APPE cycle. An evaluation was conducted to assess the potential cost avoidance associated with the interventions. Estimates of costs were derived from a comprehensive literature review and adjusted to 2011 dollars based on the consumer price index for medical care.

Results: Eighty-seven students (71%) documented 5775 interventions (3041 inpatient and 2734 outpatient) over 36 weeks with an estimated potential total cost avoidance of $780,876. The most common intervention categories reported were patient education (26%) and drug information (26%). Students also reported that 2082 (36%) potential adverse drug events (ADEs) were prevented. Seventy-one percent of interventions were accepted as is, 26% were informational only, and 3% of the recommendations were rejected. Students identified 93% of interventions as having a clinically significant impact on patient care. While we could not assign cost savings to each intervention, the intervention categories associated with the greatest cost avoidance were ADE prevented ($203,742), patient education ($148,745) drug information ($145, 201), addition of medication with clinical indication ($84,267), and therapeutic dose adjustment ($32,126).

Conclusions: P4 student pharmacists represent a valuable resource to both the inpatient and outpatient pharmacy settings. They can make a positive impact on patient care while also contributing to cost avoidance. This analysis provides the foundation for future work.