389 Cost-effectiveness of fidaxomicin for the treatment of severe Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients in North America

Monday, October 22, 2012
Westin Diplomat Resort
Quinn Bott, PharmD, Candidate, Libbi Rice, PharmD, Candidate, John Oh, PharmD Candidate, Veejaye Sinha, PharmD Candidate and Nohemie Boyer, PharmD Candidate
Northeastern University, Boston, MA

Purpose: Current guidelines for C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) recommend oral vancomycin as treatment for severe infection. A new macrocyclic antibiotic, fidaxomicin, boasts similar cure rates and lower rates of recurrence. The price of a course of fidaxomicin exceeds $2,800 while the price of oral vancomycin is near $1,200. This study examines the cost-effectiveness of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin for the treatment of severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in the inpatient setting.

Methods: A decision analytic model was developed to project the costs associated with the number of days a patient spends as an inpatient after primary infection with C. difficile. Clinical data was extracted from Phase 3 clinical trials of fidaxomicin and supported by other trials identified by systematic literature review. Cost data were taken from available literature and adjusted to 2011 US dollars.

Results: A base case analysis resulted in a cost of $8,370 per patient treated with vancomycin and $10,469 per patient treated with fidaxomicin. Monte Carlo simulations resulted in fidaxomicin being dominated by vancomycin; treatment with vancomycin provided an incremental benefit of 93 hospital days averted per 100 patients with CDI and resulted in a cost savings of $2,900 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that fidaxomicin becomes the more cost-effective option if more than 25.7 days are spent in the hospital for relapse; otherwise vancomycin remains the less costly option. If the cure rate for vancomycin falls below 75.6%, fidaxomicin becomes the more economical option.

Conclusion: This cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that fidaxomicin costs an additional $2,100 per patient and results in a length of stay that is slightly greater than if the patient had been treated with vancomycin. Fidaxomicin may be a cost-effective treatment in patients who are older, have comorbidities, have secondary or hospital-acquired CDI, or are at high risk for relapse. Otherwise, vancomycin appears to be a preferable strategy.