Methods: A meta-analysis was carried out pooling data from studies identified on a Medline and on a Cochrane Library search. Abstracts from scientific meetings were also searched. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT), evaluating exenatide or liraglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus, using active or placebo as control. Peto’s odds ratio (OR) was estimated. Results obtained were compared with both fixed and random-effects models.
Results: Of the 219 retrieved publications, 8 met the inclusion criteria. 5 AP were identified in the exenatide RCTs, 2 of which in exenatide-treated patients. Peto’s OR for exenatide exposure and AP risk was 0.66 [0.11, 3.83]. Of the 6 AP identified for liraglutide RCT’s, 5 were found in liraglutide-treated patients. Peto’s OR for liraglutide exposure and AP risk was 2.12 [0.39, 11.56]. Both fixed and random-effects models didn’t reveal different results.
Conclusion: These findings don’t provide evidence for increased AP risk and GLP-1 agonists exposure. However further experimental and observational studies are needed to confirm such findings due to the limitations of currently available data: number of patients exposed, length of exposure and lack of effectiveness outcomes under real clinical practice conditions.