Objectives: To determine the percentage of incidence and the severity of unintended medication discrepancies before and after targeting high risk patients in surgical wards.
Study Design: Quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study
Methods: This was a single-center, pre-post intervention study conducted at the surgical wards in the United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong. Following institutional review board approval, pre-intervention data (From ward A) were collected retrospectively over 3 months from December 2013 to February 2014; while post-intervention data (From ward A and B) were collected prospectively over 3 months from December 2014 to February 2015. The potential severity of the unintended medication discrepancies were rated by pharmacists and classified into 3 levels according to NCC MERP index.
Results: There was a non-statistically significant increase in the percentage of incidence from 5.32% to 7.35% (p-value 0.056) when comparing pre-intervention and post-intervention group. Statistical significance was shown when comparing ward A patients only in both groups, the percentage of incidence increased from 5.32% to 8.15% (p-value 0.021). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the severity level of medication discrepancies between pre-intervention and post-intervention group (Ward A and B: p-value 0.295; Ward A only: p-value 0.388).
Conclusions: Targeting high risk patients in medication reconciliation process in surgical wards is a feasible approach given the limited time and resources available for pharmacists, resulting in a higher percentage of incidences of unintended medication discrepancies being detected, although the detected potential severity of the discrepancies may not be altered.