23 Perceived motivating factors and barriers for the completion of postgraduate training in American pharmacy students

Wednesday, May 18, 2016
Drayton Hammond, Pharm.D., MBA, BCPS, BCCCP1, Jacob Painter, Pharm.D., Ph.D., MBA2, Douglas Oyler, PharmD3, Dr. Trisha Branan, Pharm.D.4, John Devlin, Pharm.D.5, Jeffrey Barletta, Pharm.D.6, Scott Bolesta, PharmD, BCPS, FCCM7, Brianne Dunn, Pharm.D.8, Dr. Jason Haney, Pharm.D.9, Paul Juang, Pharm.d.10, Dr. Sandra Kane-Gill, PharmD, MSc, FCCM, FCCP11, Dr. Tyree Kiser, PharmD12, Hira Shafeeq, Pharm.D.13, Debra Skaar, PharmD, FCCM14, Dr. Pamela L. Smithburger, Pharm.D., MS, BCPS15, Joseph Swanson, Pharm.D.16, Jodi Taylor, Pharm.D.17 and Brett Bailey, BS18
1Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
2Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
3Department of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington
4Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, GA
5Northeastern University
6Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy-Glendale, Glendale, AZ
7Department of Pharmacy Practice, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, PA
8South Carolina College of Pharmacy - USC Campus
9Roper Hospital, Charleston, SC
10St. Louis College of Pharmacy
11Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA
12Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO
13St. John's
14Department of Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN
15Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA
16University of Tennessee
17Union University
18University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Introduction: Post-graduate training (PGT) for pharmacists (e.g., residencies, fellowships, and graduate degrees) is a critical strategy to meet the growing demands and the evolving needs of patients and health-systems. Objectives: To examine the perceived motivating factors and barriers (MFB) to the pursuit of PGT among pharmacy students. Study Design: IRB-approved, multicenter survey of third-year pharmacy students at 12 schools of pharmacy throughout the U.S. Methods: The survey was completed on paper at 10 schools and electronically [Qualtrics (Provo, UT)] at two schools. Questions included student demographics, plans for pursuing PGT, and perceived MFBs to pursuing PGT [5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree)]. Frequency and descriptive statistics were used to characterize responses. Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-proportions rank tests were performed to determine if differences in perceived MFBs existed between students who indicated Òyes,Ó Òno,Ó or ÒundecidedÓ to complete PGT. Perceived MFBs were grouped into five domains: self-actualization, future employment, awareness of PGT, internal MFBs, and external MFBs. Results: In total, 1218 (69.5%) students completed the survey. Overall 37.1% of students indicated they do plan to pursue PGT (vs. 32.9% that do not and 30.0% that are undecided). Approximately half of the students who first learned about PGT before beginning their first year in a school of pharmacy plan to pursue PGT (p<0.001). More students that plan to complete PGT had prior hospital work experience (50.2% vs. 16.8% vs. 29.3%, p=0.001). Among all three groups, the most common reason cited to complete PGT was, ÒI desire to gain more knowledge and experience.Ó Students who were undecided about pursuing PGT possessed greater self-actualization and future employment scores than those who were uninterested in pursuing PGT. Conclusions: Introducing potential and current pharmacy students to the idea of completing PGT and work in the hospital setting may increase studentsÕ desire to pursue PGT.